Tiny Mechanical TV Drum Delivers Shockingly Sharp 4K
Opens in a new window Opens an external website Opens an external website in a new window
This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. Privacy Policy
Accept Deny Non-Essential Manage Preferences
Storage Preferences
IEEE.orgIEEE XploreIEEE StandardsIEEE Job SiteMore Sites
[](https://spectrum.ieee.org/ "Return to homepage")
Make a Portable Wide-screen Mechanical TV
Share
FOR THE TECHNOLOGY INSIDER
Search:
Explore by topic
AerospaceAIBiomedicalClimate TechComputingConsumer ElectronicsEnergyHistory of TechnologyRoboticsSemiconductorsTelecommunicationsTransportation
FOR THE TECHNOLOGY INSIDER
Topics
AerospaceAIBiomedicalClimate TechComputingConsumer ElectronicsEnergyHistory of TechnologyRoboticsSemiconductorsTelecommunicationsTransportation
Sections
FeaturesNewsOpinionCareersDIYEngineering Resources
More
NewslettersSpecial ReportsCollectionsExplainersTop Programming LanguagesRobots Guide ↗IEEE Job Site ↗
For IEEE Members
Current IssueMagazine ArchiveThe InstituteThe Institute Archive
For IEEE Members
Current IssueMagazine ArchiveThe InstituteThe Institute Archive
IEEE Spectrum
About UsContact UsReprints & Permissions ↗Advertising ↗
Follow IEEE Spectrum
[](https://twitter.com/ieeespectrum)[](https://www.facebook.com/IEEE.Spectrum)[](https://www.instagram.com/ieeespectrum/)[](https://www.threads.net/@ieeespectrum)[](https://www.linkedin.com/company/ieee-spectrum/)[](https://www.youtube.com/c/ieeespectrum)[](https://www.tiktok.com/@ieeespectrum)[](https://spectrum.ieee.org/customfeeds/feed/all-topics/rss)
Support IEEE Spectrum
_IEEE Spectrum_ is the flagship publication of the IEEE — the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences. Our articles, videos, and infographics inform our readers about developments in technology, engineering, and science.
About IEEEContact & SupportAccessibilityNondiscrimination PolicyTermsIEEE Privacy PolicyCookie PreferencesAd Privacy Options
© Copyright 2026 IEEE — All rights reserved. A public charity, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.
Enjoy more free content and benefits by creating an account
Saving articles to read later requires an IEEE Spectrum account
The Institute content is only available for members
Downloading full PDF issues is exclusive for IEEE Members
Downloading this e-book is exclusive for IEEE Members
Access to _Spectrum_ 's Digital Edition is exclusive for IEEE Members
Following topics is a feature exclusive for IEEE Members
Adding your response to an article requires an IEEE Spectrum account
Create an account to access more content and features on _IEEE Spectrum_ , including the ability to save articles to read later, download Spectrum Collections, and participate in conversations with readers and editors. For more exclusive content and features, consider Joining IEEE .
Join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to all of Spectrum’s articles, archives, PDF downloads, and other benefits. Learn more about IEEE →
Join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to this e-book plus all of _IEEE Spectrum’s_ articles, archives, PDF downloads, and other benefits. Learn more about IEEE →
Close
Access Thousands of Articles — Completely Free
Create an account and get exclusive content and features: **Save articles, download collections,** and **post comments** — all free! For full access and benefits, subscribe to _Spectrum_.
Make a Portable Wide-screen Mechanical TV
The latest development in a 100-year-old display technology
27 Aug 2026
5 min read
[](javascript:;) 1
James Brown is a New Zealand–based maker and YouTuber.
An old idea gets a new spin with a miniature mechanical TV with 4K horizontal resolution.
James Provost
[](mailto:?subject=Make%20a%20Portable%20Wide-screen%20Mechanical%20TV&body=https://spectrum.ieee.org/mechanical-tv-2677767814)
displayselectromechanical TVtelevisionrp2040Pi Picotype:departments
I never intended to join the cutting edge of electromechanical television. I just wanted to make a nice clock. But sometimes you have to go where the engineering takes you, and in my case it took me to the Scanwheel, a pocket-size wide-screen electromechanical TV with a resolution of 4,096 by 20 pixels. Yup, that’s 4K by 20.
!Image 4: The major components of the Scanwheel TVThe 3D-printed drum [top] is spun by a motor controlled by a driver board [second row, from top]. The driver board, in turn, is controlled by a Raspberry Pi Pico [middle], which also controls the LEDs [second row, from bottom], which are mounted in the 3D-printed casing [bottom] so that the holes pass over them as the drum turns.James Provost
Electromechanical television was the first form of practical television, developed by John Logie Baird in the 1920s. He used a so-called Nipkow disk, which has a spiral of holes punched through it. As the disk rotates, the holes pass one by one in front of a light source. By varying the brightness of the light as a hole travels across it, you can draw one scan line of a video frame. Spin the disk fast enough, and persistence of vision makes it look like an entire frame is being displayed simultaneously. Commercial electromechanical TV sets were produced in the United Kingdom, with regular broadcasts provided by the BBC in the 1930s.
Although cathode-ray tubes replaced electromechanical televisions in the 1940s, hobbyists have continued to build them and even improve on the original technology. For example, in the June 2022 installment of _\_IEEE Spectrum\__’s Hands On, Markus Mierse presented a desktop-size 3D-printed color version.
I built an electromechanical display myself some years ago, but it had a traditional design with a Nipkow disk made from a vinyl record with holes drilled in it. Recently I started tinkering with electromechanical TV again as an outgrowth of my YouTube channel. There I’ve been focusing on developing volumetric displays, which create 3D pixels floating within a volume of space. In particular, I was interested in borrowing some ideas from plenoptic cameras, which use pinholes and lenses to capture multidimensional light fields of samples.
I wondered if I could run the process in reverse, to _\_create\__ light fields rather than capture them. I often explore ideas in two dimensions before expanding to the third, so I thought I’d first demonstrate a 2D display. I decided to make an electromechanical device into a clock. After all, you don’t need high resolution to display digits.
How Does the Scanwheel Display Work?
Thinking about the display as a clockface pushed me toward some key ideas. First, instead of having just one display area, I would use five light sources to create multiple areas—four to represent hours and minutes, and a central area for a separator that would blink each second. Second, to align the digits in a readable row rather than have them spread around an arc, I swapped the Nipkow disk for an established alternative: a Nipkow drum.
With a drum, the holes run along the curved cylindrical surface in a stair-step pattern. This means they always trace a straight line from the perspective of a viewer looking from the side, so the clock’s digits would be horizontally aligned.
“In tests, I’ve pushed the horizontal resolution to more than 8,000 pixels.”
These two decisions turned out to be key to achieving both miniaturization and high horizontal resolution. A disk needs a fairly wide diameter so that the scan lines aren’t ridiculously curved. But curvature isn’t a problem with a drum. A drum can be much smaller than a disk that has the same number of scan lines. (And unlike in the 1920s, packing multiple light sources close together inside a small drum isn’t a problem with modern LEDs.) I settled on a 6-centimeter-wide drum, turning the device from desktop-size to something you could carry in your pocket.
I then realized my five display zones could work in concert to create one single wide screen. Because it’s possible to modulate the brightness of an LED at very high rates, the horizontal resolution can also be very high. My system currently has 4K horizontal resolution, and this is primarily limited by the amount of onboard memory I have available. This memory holds the buffer that stores pixel data for each frame before it is read out to the LEDs and displayed. In tests, I’ve pushed the horizontal resolution to more than 8,000 pixels.
Despite the Scanwheel’s low vertical resolution—at 20 pixels, it has fewer scan lines than Baird’s 30-line televisions—its high horizontal resolution makes the legibility of the display surprisingly good: I can display not just crude digits but video streamed into the frame buffer.
Using the RP2040 Chip’s Special Silicon
That frame buffer lives on a Raspberry Pi Pico microcontroller board, based around the RP2040 microcontroller. The RP2040 is ideal for this project because of the chip’s dedicated PIO silicon. PIO stands for programmable input/output, and it’s a block of four coprocessors that uses a very limited instruction set. Each coprocessor can be set up to chew through input/output streams completely independently of the RP2040’s two CPU cores.
!Image 5: An illustration comparing the arched lines of a disk display versus the straight lines of a drum.The first mechanical TVs used disks, which had to be wide to minimize image distortion but allowed bulky light sources. With small, modern light sources, a smaller drum can create images with minimal distortion.James Provost
It’s thanks to the PIO that I’m able to keep up with the spinning drum and modulate each of the five LEDs simultaneously as holes pass over them, a task complicated by the fact that the center LED is not a monochrome LED, but a color LED with separate red, green, and blue channels. In fact, the PIO does nearly all the work, pulling data from the frame buffer and controlling the LEDs and the spinning of the drum. The code running on the CPU (written in MicroPython) is primarily responsible for setting up the PIO and then leaving well enough alone.
A stepper motor connected to a driver board spins the drum, with power provided by the USB jack on the Pi Pico. All the Pi Pico has to do controlwise is send the board a pulse to incrementally advance the drum’s position once every millisecond. Video data is streamed into the Pi Pico via a network interface. You can set up the Scanwheel to mirror a portion of your computer’s screen, or to act as a separate display.
The casing, including the drum, is 3D printed. Now for a neat bit: In the Scanwheel’s GitHub repository at https://github.com/AncientJames/Scanwheel/tree/main, alongside all the other files you’ll need to make this project yourself, there’s an OpenSCAD file that generates the 3D-print file for the drum based on adjustable parameters. This means you can easily make a taller drum and add more scan lines, or try other customizations for your very own portable electromechanical display. You can even use it as a clock!
From Your Site Articles
- Hack an Analog TV Into a Geek TV ›
- Print an Arduino-Powered Color Mechanical Television ›
- In 1926, TV Was Mechanical ›
Related Articles Around the Web
displayselectromechanical TVtelevisionrp2040Pi Picotype:departments
is a New Zealand–based maker and YouTuber. See full bio→
The Conversation (0)
Publish
Sort by
[](https://spectrum.ieee.org/chips-act-impact-semiconductor-manufacturing)
The U.S. Is Building CHIPS Act Fabs but Neglecting R&D
27 Aug 2026
4 min read
[](javascript:;) 1
[](https://spectrum.ieee.org/ollobot-ai-companion-robot)
AI Companion Robots Are Closing the Human Connection in Modern Homes
25 Aug 2026
7 min read
[](javascript:;) 2
[](https://spectrum.ieee.org/cold-war-codebreaker-nsa-ibm)
IBM Built the Cold War’s Most Powerful Code Breaker for the NSA
25 Aug 2026
12 min read
[](javascript:;) 6
Related Stories
Consumer ElectronicsOctober 2024MagazineFeature
How LG and Samsung Are Making TV Screens Disappear
Consumer ElectronicsNewsMagazineMay 2023
Ultrathin Metasurface Displays Take Aim at the LCD
Print an Arduino-Powered Color Mechanical Television
A New NASA Design Turbocharges Nuclear Spacecraft
The synchronal bimodal nuclear rocket could slash travel time to Mars
26 Aug 2026
13 min read
[](javascript:;) 3
[](mailto:?subject=A%20New%20NASA%20Design%20Turbocharges%20Nuclear%20Spacecraft&body=https://spectrum.ieee.org/bimodal-nuclear-spacecraft)
[](https://spectrum.ieee.org/bimodal-nuclear-spacecraft)
This artist’s impression of a synchronal bimodal nuclear rocket shows a nuclear thermal engine for high-thrust maneuvers and an array of electric thrusters for highly efficient low-thrust propulsion.
John MacNeill
Orange
Summary
- NASA and industry engineers propose a synchronal bimodal nuclear rocket (S‑BNR) to dramatically cut transit times to destinations around the solar system, such as Mars, by combining nuclear thermal and electric propulsion.
- S‑BNR uses a single reactor with two independent fluid loops and correspondingly optimized fuel zones, eliminating complex mode-switching valves while providing both high thrust and continuous electric power.
- Major challenges include developing fuel elements that integrate well together, ground testing, nuclear launch safety, and multi-agency collaboration to mature the technology from modeling to in‑space demonstrations.
**The biggest threat to any** crewed expedition to Mars is _\_time\__. NASA’s shortest blueprint for sending people to the Red Planetand back requires spending 620 days in space and 30 days on Mars. Even setting aside the compounding challenges of building life-support systems that can operate without resupply for that long, or the fact that longer journeys leave more time for unlucky accidents, life in microgravity and solar and cosmic radiation will inexorably exact their cumulative toll on human bodies.
We want to make it possible to dramatically reduce the length of time crews must spend in space—down to just 335 days in transit or less. This will both simplify many engineering challenges and keep astronauts healthier and safer. We believe the key to this time reduction is a new approach to building a holy grail of space exploration, the bimodal nuclear rocket.
!Image 10: A photograph of a tall plume of rocker exhaust firing up into the air from a test stand in the desert.In the 1960s, U.S. open-air ground tests demonstrated much of the technology needed for nuclear thermal rockets as part of the NERVA and Rover projects.Nevada State Museum, Las Vegas
!Image 11: A photograph of a squat nozzle standing on a rig in a concrete test chamber, Technicians at NASA’s Lewis Research Center test a nozzle design for a nuclear thermal rocket in 1965. GRC/NASA
!Image 12: A roughly four-meter-tall conical device is surrounded by ground technicians. The prototype SNAP-10A, orbited in 1965, is to date still the only nuclear reactor launched into space by the United States. George Rinhart/Corbis/Getty Images
_\_We\__ are Kurt Polzin, chief engineer of NASA’s space nuclear propulsion project at the Marshall Space Flight Center, with over two decades of experience in advanced propulsion research, and Robert Schleicher, chief engineer for nuclear technologies and materials at General Atomics. And to explain just what a bimodal nuclear rocket is, and why the new version we have conceived together brings it closer to future reality, we first need to take a quick trip to the past.
As early as 1946, researchers realized that nuclear reactors had the potential to become extremely efficient thermal rocket engines. Most rockets are thermal rockets, and they work by expelling hot gases through a nozzle, thrusting the rocket forward. While there are other factors such as nozzle shape, generally speaking, the hotter and faster you make the rocket’s exhaust gases, the more acceleration the rocket will produce for a given mass of propellant. Because a smaller molecule will move faster than a larger one when heated to a given temperature, the smaller the molecular mass of your propellants, the better. By convention, the efficiency of a rocket engine is measured by how long the engine can exert a thrust equal to the initial weight of its propellant, a quantity known as _\_specific impulse\__.
In a conventional thermal rocket, such as those used in every launch to orbit since Sputnik, the exhaust temperature and speed—and thus the specific impulse—is dictated by the energy released by a chemical reaction and the mass of the reaction’s by-product. The most efficient chemical rockets today combust hydrogen with oxygen, producing water and a specific impulse that tops out around 450 seconds.
But a nuclear rocket is not limited by chemistry. The heart of a nuclear thermal rocket is a nuclear fission reactor, in which chain reactions in uranium fuel release much more energy per kilogram than is possible with chemical combustion. A turbopump forces liquid hydrogen alone—with its very small molecular mass—through the reactor’s core, heating it to temperatures of at least 2,700 kelvin before expelling it, resulting in a specific impulse of 900 seconds or more.
In the 1950s and 1960s, the Rover and NERVA (Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Applications) programs ground-tested nuclear thermal rockets. By the early 1970s, the technology had matured to the point whereflight tests were being planned. But changing political and budgetary winds led to nuclear thermal development being shut down in 1973.
Another prong of nuclear propulsion that has also demonstrated considerable promise is nuclear electric propulsion. In electric propulsion, instead of creating a stream of hot rocket exhaust through chemical reactions or exposure to the core of a nuclear reactor, electricity is generated and used to create electromagnetic fields that accelerate an ionized propellant such as xenon or lithium.
Various schemes to do this exist, including some that have already seen considerable time in space, such as the ion thrusters used on the Dawn asteroid mission launched in 2007. So far, these electric thrusters have only been powered by solar panels. But with a nuclear reactor as part of a power plant that supplies the juice, more thrust could be produced. And moving beyond solar power is particularly important in missions to the outer solar system where sparse solar photons would require enormous solar arrays.
With electric thrusters, specific impulses in the range of 2,200 to 4,600 seconds are possible, but currently with very low thrust. With the energy available to a nuclear-powered electric propulsion engine, you could have greater acceleration and reduced mission times. The nuclear reactor could also provide electrical power for all the spacecraft systems as well.
The System for Nuclear Auxiliary Power (SNAP) program launched the SNAP-10A in 1965 as a proof of concept, the first—and so far only—U.S. nuclear power reactor in space. It generated about 600 watts of electrical power for 43 days before shutdown and is still in orbit. Subsequent U.S. initiatives for more substantive electric power and nuclear thermal propulsion systems, such as the SP-100, Project Timberwind, and Project Prometheus, along with more recent projects like Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) and Joint Emergent Technology Supplying On-Orbit Nuclear (JETSON), have emerged sporadically over the years. None of these have yet progressed to actual flight.
However, space nuclear power got a huge shot in the arm in March 2026 when NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman announced a new space exploration initiative. As part of that initiative, the agency plans to launch Space Reactor-1 _\_Freedom\__ (SR-1) to deliver a trio of robot-survey helicopters to Mars. Driven by nuclear electric propulsion, SR-1 aims to demonstrate fission technology in deep space and would be the first nuclear-powered interplanetary spacecraft, generating 20 kilowatts of electric power aboard.
This is a bold step for NASA, and brings us up to the present, but the details of the proposed mission also highlight a familiar limitation of nuclear electric propulsion. Even with improved acceleration, electric propulsion still cannot generate the powerful bursts of thrust needed to escape gravity wells, such as those of Earth or Mars, or perform time-critical maneuvers, like course corrections. On the other hand, while not as efficient and unable to supply electrical power for spacecraft systems, nuclear thermal engines are great at delivering high thrust at critical moments.
What is a bimodal nuclear rocket?
Some engineers would suggest we build two separate systems—one reactor for thermal propulsion and another reactor for power and electric propulsion. But since at least the 1990s, it has been the dream of many engineers to combine nuclear thermal and nuclear electric in one package, with one reactor: the bimodal nuclear rocket.
Most previous bimodal proposals depend on complex valve arrangements to integrate the propulsion and power systems. In thermal propulsion mode, the reactor is brought to maximum activity by a set of control drums that ring the core, which is composed of a matrix of long uranium-fuel elements. The drums take the shape of long cylinders made of beryllium, with a 120-degree segment of each cylinder covered with boron carbide. Boron absorbs neutrons, and when that segment faces the reactor, the reactor’s activity is low as neutrons escaping from the core are captured. Rotating the boron segment so that it faces away from the core (leaving only the beryllium exposed) increases nuclear activity as the beryllium reflects escaping neutrons back into the core’s fuel elements, where they can contribute to chain reactions.
!Image 13: A diagram showing a squashed elliptical transfer path between Earth and Mars and back againThis proposed trajectory, developed at NASA’s Glenn Research Center, shows where high-thrust maneuvers [blue dots] are executed by a nuclear thermal engine and additional low-thrust, high-efficiency acceleration and deceleration is performed by electric propulsion [hashed lines show thrust direction].NASA Glenn Research Center
Once the reactor is generating large amounts of heat, liquid hydrogen is pumped through channels that run the length of the core. Turned into an expanding hot gas, the hydrogen blasts from the other end of the core to form the rocket’s powerful exhaust.
In nuclear power mode, the reactor’s activity is damped. Valves seal the channels and a so-called power-conversion fluid—typically a mixture of helium and xenon gas—circulates through the reactor in a closed loop. The reactor is still hot enough to warm this fluid, which drives a turbine connected to an electrical generator.
The key point here is that a single set of flow channels and nuclear-fuel elements are used for both modes. But the valves used to switch modes face the formidable challenge of enduring months, or even years, in a harsh radiation environment while maintaining leak-tight performance.
The core’s activity is controlled by the rotating drums surrounding it. Within the core, low-temperature fuel elements [left in blue, and top right] produce electric power by heating a circulating fluid. High-temperature fuel elements [left in red, and bottom right] heat hydrogen as a propellant. (The taper of the HTFE’s exhaust channel is exaggerated for illustrative purposes. Ways of packaging the HTFE’s uranium fuel other than with particles are possible.)John MacNeill
In addition, the nuclear-fuel elements surrounding the channels must be able to operate for short durations at very high temperatures during thermal thrust maneuvers and for long durations at lower temperatures during the rest of the voyage. It is difficult to build one type of element capable of both. Hence, the complexity and demanding engineering requirements of previous bimodal designs has hindered their practical application.
We propose a simplified approach, a hybrid system we call the synchronal bimodal nuclear rocket (S-BNR). The genesis for this design came about when we were attending a conference together in 2025. One of us (Polzin) had an initial idea, and in time-honored tradition, he sketched it out on a napkin to see if the other (Schleicher) thought there was actually a way to do it. We’ve been working on refining the concept ever since.
How the synchronal bimodal nuclear rocket works
Rather than relying on a complex valve system, the S-BNR uses two hydraulically independent loops within a single reactor core, one open loop (for thermal propulsion) and one closed loop (for electrical power). The core is divided into two zones, one per loop, differentiated by the type of fuel elements in each. Several designs for the fuel elements are possible: In our preliminary design, the high-temperature fuel elements (HTFEs) in the thermal propulsion zone consist of a bed of “pebbles”—uranium fuel encased in zirconium carbide—that surround a central tapering channel and operate at greater than 2,700 K. (One possible alternative for the HTFEs would be a solid fuel design, as with NERVA.) The hydrogen propellant passes through the pebble bed, where the pebbles’ large surface area maximizes the transfer of heat needed for efficient high-thrust propulsion.
The other zone has low-temperature fuel elements (LTFEs), optimized for long-term, efficient production of electricity, which can range from tens of kilowatts to several megawatts. In these elements, the uranium fuel in solid form surrounds a double-walled channel: The power-conversion fluid is pumped down the inside and returns along the outside wall, absorbing heat from the fuel and operating at moderate temperatures (at or above 1,200 K).
!Image 15: A block diagram showing the fluid flow with the reactor core.The electric-power and nuclear-thrust elements of the core have separate fluid loops, which eliminates the need for valves to switch between closed-loop operation for power generation and open-loop operation for propulsion.John MacNeill
Both the HTFEs and LTFEs contribute the neutrons required to sustain chain reactions. In power-only mode, residual heat moves from the HTFEs into adjoining LTFEs. The physical interface between the elements is designed to moderate this thermal flow to balance two competing needs: It must allow enough heat flow to safely remove the residual heat from the HTFEs, but it must also limit that heat flow so the LTFEs’ temperatures do not go past their allowable limits when the HTFEs operate at high power.
During combined propulsion and power operation, a heat exchanger on the power loop preheats the hydrogen propellant for the thrust loop, aiding the turbopump that feeds the hydrogen through the core. After a propulsion burn is completed and the HTFE chain reactions are damped by the control elements, the power loop removes residual-decay heat coming from the HTFEs as described above, eliminating the requirement in earlier designs for additional propellant flow just to cool down the core while on standby. This dual-loop system also means the engine can produce high thrust whenever needed while allowing the generator to remain active at all times—a significant advantage for crewed missions.
By adopting this dual-loop architecture, the S-BNR removes the need for the problematic mode-switching valves found in earlier concepts. Each fission zone is constructed with materials tailored to its specific temperature and power requirements, ensuring optimal performance and durability. The result is uninterrupted electrical power across all mission stages, making it unnecessary to carry additional liquid hydrogen just to manage decay heat.
The challenges ahead
While significant progress in developing the design of the S-BNR has been made, substantial challenges remain. The reactor must maintain stable control across a wide power range, from modest levels for electricity generation to hundreds of megawatts of thermal power during high-thrust operation. Operating the power-generation loop in close proximity to the HTFEs requires very careful management of both temperature and the neutrons emitted by the fuel elements.
And crucially, demonstrating reliable, long-duration performance is particularly demanding: Missions to Mars may require years of continuous power generation. Outer-planet probes equipped with S-BNR engines could extend that to a decade or longer.
In the past, nuclear thermal propulsion fuel elements were engineered for extremely high temperatures but only brief operational lifetimes (typically hours), whereas proposed nuclear electric propulsion fuel elements are optimized for lower temperatures and intended to last for years. By using two different types of fuel elements in the S-BNR, we can take advantage of the design heritage of both these development tracks. Fortunately, recent NASA-sponsored research has produced several promising candidates that may meet these demanding requirements.
Ground-testing these systems is also a challenge. Early in the Rover and NERVA era, the exhaust from test engines was blasted into the atmosphere, something now unacceptable. Today, any ground test of an engine must completely capture all potentially radioactive exhaust products. Fortunately, a number of approacheshave been developed to capture and scrub the exhaust, although these methods currently carry a significant price tag.
Then there is the ultimate test: flying an S-BNR in space. International regulatory and safety protocols for nuclear launches were developed largely in response to the Soviet Union’s launch of dozens of nuclear-powered Radar Ocean Reconnaissance Satellite (RORSAT) radar spy satellites in the 1970s and 1980s. There were a number of incidents, with the most serious leaving radioactive debris strewn across a swath of Canada in 1978. This history led to a consensus in the space community that might be summarized as “Thou shalt not bring a nuclear reactor to criticality in any Earth orbit that decays faster than dangerous isotopes.”
Thus any S-BNR would be launched atop a conventional chemical rocket, with a completely cold reactor and fresh fuel. Fresh uranium fuel is not in fact very radioactive: The potentially larger concern is the chemical toxicity of this heavy metal, but it can easily be handled by wearing light protective suits, respirators, and gloves. Only after the control elements have been adjusted to permit chain reactions to begin within the core are highly radioactive isotopes able to form from fission fragments. There would be even less cause for concern than when launching a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG), such as the sort that are currently powering the Perseverance rover on Mars and the New Horizons mission in the outer solar system.
Even in the most extreme scenario imaginable—the chemical booster explodes and somehow damages the reactor’s control elements in just the right way to initiate a chain reaction—there wouldn’t be time to produce a large amount of toxic isotopes before the reactor broke apart and reactions ceased. (We can be sure of this because Project Rover actually tested this kind of worst-case scenario in 1965 with the Kiwi-TNT test, where an engine prototype was rigged to produce a runaway chain reaction sufficient to vaporize the reactor core due to the immense internal pressure buildup. Negligible radiation spread outside a radius of two miles (3.2 kilometers), well within the range of safe distances for launching _\_any\__ rocket capable of reaching orbit, and site decontamination was possible after only a few days of radioactive decay.)
Despite all these considerable engineering challenges, the foundation laid by decades of investment in nuclear thermal and electric propulsion and terrestrial nuclear power technologies provides a solid platform for continued advancement. Indeed, much of the foundational work is already underway through ongoing NASA andU.S. Space Force efforts.
!Image 16: A boxy spacecraft with large solar cells flies through space, propelled by a blue exhaust from a thruster. The Dawn asteroid mission relied on electric thrusters, demonstrating their utility for long-duration spaceflight.JPL-Caltech/NASA
We envision the following action plan to merge these technology pathways: Modeling must be performed to demonstrate and verify strategies for thermal management and the control of nuclear processes over the full range of operating power levels. Near-term non-nuclear testing will validate fluid loop operation, heat transfer mechanisms, and control strategies. Next, component-level irradiation and thermal trials will qualify new materials. Then, integrated reactor testing will begin, first without nuclear fuel and later with fueled reactors undergoing fission. Finally, initial in-space demonstrations could begin with lower-power systems, eventually scaling up to full bimodal capabilities.
Achieving success will require close collaboration across NASA, the Department of Energy, the Department of Defense, industry partners, and the broader technical community. Progress will depend on advancements in high-temperature fuels and materials, improved systems for power conversion and heat transport, and the adoption of innovative manufacturing techniques and methods to control nuclear fission over a wide range of output power. In particular, integrated system testing will be more complex than previous programs such as NERVA, due to the combined functions and distinct operational regimes for thermal propulsion and power generation. We hope engineers and researchers with relevant expertise will be encouraged to contribute to addressing these challenges, whether in the areas of thermal management, reactor modeling and control, extended-duration testing, or safety analysis.
Past ground tests and limited demonstrations have already established the capabilities of space nuclear systems. With architectures like the synchronal bimodal nuclear rocket, the prospect of integrating high-thrust propulsion and sustained power generation becomes increasingly practical and versatile. The next phase is not simply about traveling fast. It’s about building crewed and uncrewed spacecraft that can reliably travel to destinations throughout the solar system that are currently difficult or impossible to reach, with missions potentially lasting years or even decades.
_This article appears in the September 2026 print issue as “A Reimagined Nuclear Rocket.”_
From Your Site Articles
- Europe’s Plan for Faster Space Travel ›
- Nuclear-Powered Rockets Get a Second Look for Travel to Mars ›
- DARPA and NASA Aim to Test Nuclear Rocket by 2026 ›
Related Articles Around the Web
- Space Nuclear Propulsion - NASA ›
Keep Reading ↓
{"imageShortcodeIds":[]}
SemiconductorsSponsored Article
Building Technology People Can Trust
The future of engineering will be defined by those who verify and improve complex systems safely
Ritu Favre is President of Emerson’s Test & Measurement business group. With more than 30 years of experience in tech, including her role as general manager of NI, she received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in electrical engineering from Arizona State University.
24 Aug 2026
4 min read
[](javascript:;) 3
!Image 17: Stacked green printed circuit boards with electronic components on a work surface
Rising complexity in semiconductor validation and verification is an example of the new era of test.
Emerson
[](mailto:?subject=Building%20Technology%20People%20Can%20Trust&body=https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-connected-test-and-measurement-platforms)
_This article is brought to you by Emerson._
I’ve spent much of my career as an engineer, including years in the semiconductor industry. And one lesson has stayed with me through every major technology shift: innovation always creates new complexity.
In semiconductors, we have seen that repeatedly. Every generation has delivered breakthroughs in performance and capability, but each step forward made it harder to understand system behavior. What used to be easy to validate on the component level with a test bench now needs a much wider view.
!Image 18: Smiling woman with curly hair in black blazer posing at a table against plain background“The future of engineering will be defined by who can verify, understand, and improve complex systems fast enough to safely keep innovation moving forward,” says Ritu Favre, President of Emerson’s Test & Measurement business group.Emerson
Chiplet-based designs are a prime example. A chiplet from one supplier, an interposer from another, and a packaging process from a third may all perform perfectly on their own. Yet there is a chance for unexpected behavior when you put them together in a system. More and more often, the hardest engineering challenges are not in the individual components themselves. The problems are found when we start to combine components and have them interact with each other.
These challenges extend far beyond semiconductors. Products are becoming more software-defined and dependent on interactions across different technologies and environments. Think about the interactions needed for a modern car using adaptive cruise control on a bumpy road in a rainstorm. Or a passenger jet adjusting wing flaps and engine speeds in turbulent weather to maintain safety and stability. Both the car and the jet are being guided by complex computer systems with thousands of sensors leading to thousands of interactions every second. And in many cases, there are multiple computer systems working together. We are building systems of remarkable capability but understanding how they will act under real-world conditions is getting harder.
That is why I believe we are entering a new era of test. The defining challenge of modern engineering is no longer simply what we can design and build. It is what we can confidently verify.
Rethinking the Role of Test
In this new era, test can’t be an afterthought. For decades, test was treated as the final checkpoint before release. Design teams developed a product, test teams validated performance, and organizations looked for a final pass/fail to determine whether they were ready to move forward. That model worked fine when systems were more self-contained and predictable. Today, that approach can lead to more risk.
I believe we are entering a new era of test. The defining challenge of modern engineering is no longer simply what we can design and build. It is what we can confidently verify.
Many of the dela