You're Weirder Than You Think
One of my long-time hobby-horses is that people are way weirder than they realize, and that our politics would look different if more people understood how massively unrepresentative they are of the rest of the population. So here's a little quiz designed to demonstrate how unrepresentative you are of the US population.
How Unrepresentative Are You?
Self-Portrait № 01 A Quiz · 7 Questions
How unrepresentative are you?
You probably don't look much like _the average American._
all 1,000 still match — answer questions below to narrow the field
Answer seven questions to see how many Americans share your exact combination of traits. The data comes from the General Social Survey.
Question 1 of 7
Press Y or N — or click
Findings
Where each answer puts you
Methodology & sources
Data comes from the General Social Survey (GSS) cumulative file, 1972–2024, Release 3. We use respondents from the four most recent waves (2018, 2021, 2022, 2024), restricted to those who answered all seven questions — 4,326 people, weighted by `wtssps` (NORC's recommended post-stratified weight). Three of the seven questions (about God, gun ownership, and views on same-sex relations) are asked of only a sub-sample of GSS respondents in each wave, which is why the complete-case sample is smaller than the full recent wave count.
The widget stores a 128-cell joint distribution (one cell for every combination of yes/no answers). After each answer, it sums the cells consistent with your answers so far — giving the true conditional probability that a random American still matches you, with all correlations between answers preserved. After all 7 answers, the sum collapses to a single cell.
Some rare combinations have very few observations, so percentages below ~0.1% are noisy. One cell with no observations is given a 0.05% floor.
- * *
An important note: the "easy" way to make a tool like this would be to get a bunch of interesting stats about the American population (32% of Americans have a bachelor's degree! 50% of Americans believe that God exists, without any doubts!) and then just multiply those numbers together, implicitly assuming that each result is independent. But of course, these things are _not_ independent: for example, people with bachelor's degrees are less likely to believe with certainty in the existence of God.
This tool avoids that problem because it uses data directly from the General Social Survey, where thousands of Americans were asked a long series of questions, and researchers can access all the results in detail (huge thanks to the GSS team!) So when the tool says that 13% of Americans have a bachelor's degree and are certain about God, that's based on counting all the actual humans who specifically replied with those two answers out of the total respondents to the survey.
If you want to go deeper on the data, check out this explorer tool that lets you break down the data by age & see how many weirdness-points you'd get by changing each of your answers.
[I did shockingly little of the work on building this tool, so compliments should largely go to Claude, but if you have complaints or think this is wrong please do let me know. If you're interested in the process you can see the conversation here.]