Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media

[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#)
- ARTICLESCurrent IssueLatest ArticlesSpecial FeaturesList of Issues_PNAS Nexus_
- AUTHORSInformation for AuthorsEditorial and Journal PoliciesSubmission ProceduresPublication Charges
* Topics
#### Featured Topics
- Physics
- Sustainable Development Goals
#### Articles By Topic
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
#### Featured Topics
- Sustainable Development Goals
#### Articles By Topic
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
#### Featured Topic
- Sustainable Development Goals
#### Articles By Topic
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Ecology
- Genetics
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
*
[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123# "Search")
[Shopping cart with 0 item Cart](https://www.pnas.org/action/showCart?FlowID=1 "Cart")
Individual LoginInstitutional Login
Quick Search anywhere
Enter journal, DOI, article type, keywords, authors, etc.
Quick search in Citations
Journal*
Year Volume* Issue* Page/eLocation ID*
*Required field
Quick Search in Journals
Enter journal, DOI, article type, keywords, authors, etc.
Quick Search in Journals
Enter journal, DOI, article type, keywords, authors, etc.
Searching:
Anywhere
AnywhereCitationPNAS NexusProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Advanced SearchSearch
SUGGESTED SEARCHES:
Covid-19Artificial IntelligenceMpoxClimate ChangeGun Violence
Individual LoginInstitutional Login
Quick Search anywhere
Enter journal, DOI, article type, keywords, authors, etc.
- ###### ARTICLES
- ###### AUTHORS
- Editorial and Journal Policies
- Topics

- [](https://www.facebook.com/pages/PNAS/18262365099 "Facebook")
- _
- _
- [](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYjvFEQMgH6ou8fSYfiOKCw "Youtube")
- [](https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/pnas-news/ "LinkedIn")
- [](https://www.pnas.org/action/showPreferences?menuTab=Alerts "Mail")
- [](https://www.pnas.org/about/rss "RSS feeds")
ContactSite MapTerms & Privacy PolicyAccessibility
backPhysical Sciences
#### Featured Topics
- Physics
- Sustainable Development Goals
#### Articles By Topic
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
backSocial Sciences
#### Featured Topics
- Sustainable Development Goals
#### Articles By Topic
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
backBiological Sciences
#### Featured Topic
- Sustainable Development Goals
#### Articles By Topic
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Ecology
- Genetics
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
backTopics
Reference #1
[Research Article](https://www.pnas.org/topic/type/research-article "Research Article landing page")
[Psychological and Cognitive Sciences](https://www.pnas.org/topic/psych-soc "Psychological and Cognitive Sciences landing page")
Share on
- [](https://www.pnas.org/#facebook "Facebook")
- [](https://www.pnas.org/#x "X")
- [](https://www.pnas.org/#bluesky "Bluesky")
- [](https://www.pnas.org/#linkedin "LinkedIn")
- [](https://www.pnas.org/#email "Email")
[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123# "Check for updates on crossmark")
Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media
Hongkai Maohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2873-4076hm404@stanford.edu, Yuan Chang Leonghttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2499-2393, Yutong Jiang, +2, Alex Koch, William J.Bradyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-5446, and Joshua Conrad Jacksonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-9815jcjackson@fas.harvard.edu-2Authors Info & Affiliations
Edited by Mark Granovetter, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; received October 6, 2025; accepted May 7, 2026
June 22, 2026
123 (26) e2527316123
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2527316123
Metrics
#### Total Views 222
- Last 12 Months 222
[View all metrics](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123?doi=10.1073/pnas.2527316123#tab-metrics-inner "Go to metrics page")
Track CitationsAdd to Reading List
[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#tab-citations)
Contents
[Vol. 123 | No. 26](https://www.pnas.org/toc/pnas/123/26 "View Table of Contents")
- Abstract
- Data, Materials, and Software Availability
- Figures
- Tables
- Media
- Share
Significance
We live in a digital age, where billions of people engage in dialogue within topic-bound communities and threads. In an archival analysis of over 2 billion Reddit comments and an experiment, we show that this dialogue becomes more negative over time. Further analyses suggest that negativity rises over time because social media users seek to make unique comments on the same topic, and it is easier to differentiate oneself through negative comments than through positive comments. As threads and communities evolve, and it becomes more difficult to make unique observations, users turn to negativity. Our studies show how basic human motives interact with the structure of social media platforms, posing an acute challenge for sustaining healthy online dialogue.
Abstract
Most people believe that social media discourse is negative and divisive. Here we show how this negativity can evolve even when users are not motivated to be negative. We propose that social media users seek to differentiate themselves from other users, and it is easier to differentiate oneself through negativity than positivity because negative information is more heterogeneous and counternormative than positive information. This makes users increasingly likely to post negative comments as a conversation unfolds and it becomes more challenging to make unique contributions. Analyzing 2.05 billion comments from 2,150 Reddit communities shows that comments become more negative over time, both within threads and community histories. This trend toward negativity is mediated by the semantic uniqueness of comments, suggesting that it arises from users differentiating themselves. This trend is strongest when initial dialogue is positive, making negative comments highly counternormative. We replicate these patterns in an experiment simulating social media dialogue (_n_ = 3,685). Participants become more negative over time, but only when incentivized to be unique, and especially when dialogue begins positively. These findings suggest that the structure of social media platforms interacts with human motivation to foster a drift toward negativity over time in online discourse.
Get full access to this article
Purchase, subscribe, or recommend this article to your librarian.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
Analysis scripts and data are available at https://osf.io/68wvm/ (27). Data and code may not be used for commercial purposes. The detoxify classifier is available at https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify (42), and the sentence transformer used to generate embeddings is available at https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (43).
Acknowledgments
Author contributions
H.M., Y.C.L., A.K., and J.C.J. designed research; H.M., Y.J., and J.C.J. performed research; H.M., Y.J., and J.C.J. analyzed data; and H.M., Y.C.L., A.K., W.J.B., and J.C.J. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Supporting Information
Appendix 01 (PDF)
- Download
- 3.41 MB
References
1
G. Fariello, D. Jemielniak, A. Sulkowski, Does Godwin’s law (rule of Nazi analogies) apply in observable reality? An empirical study of selected words in 199 million Reddit posts _New Media Soc._**26**, 389–404 (2024).
2
J. J. Van Bavel, C. E. Robertson, K. del Rosario, J. Rasmussen, S. Rathje, Social media and morality. _Annu. Rev. Psychol._**75**, 311–340 (2024).
3
W. J. Brady, J. A. Wills, J. T. Jost, J. A. Tucker, J. J. Van Bavel, Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._**114**, 7313–7318 (2017).
4
I. Waller, A. Anderson, Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. _Nature_**600**, 264–268 (2021).
5
W. J. Brady, M. J. Crockett, J. J. Van Bavel, The MAD model of moral contagion: The role of motivation, attention, and design in the spread of moralized content online. _Perspect. Psychol. Sci._**15**, 978–1010 (2020).
6
M. Avalle et al., Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time. _Nature_**628**, 582–589 (2024).
7
S. Rathje, C. Robertson, W. J. Brady, J. J. Van Bavel, People think that social media platforms do (but should not) amplify divisive content. _Perspect. Psychol. Sci._**19**, 781–795 (2024).
8
B. Auxier, 64% of Americans say social media have a mostly negative effect on the way things are going in the U.S. today. _Pew Res. Cent._ (2020), [https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/10/15/64-of-americans-say-social-media-have-a-mostly-negative-effect-on-the-way-things-are-going-in-the-u-s-today/](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/10/15/64-of-americans-say-social-media-have-a-mostly-negative-effect-on-the-way-things-are-going-in-the-u-s-today/) [Accessed 19 April 2025].
9
C. K. Tokita, A. M. Guess, C. E. Tarnita, Polarized information ecosystems can reorganize social networks via information cascades. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._**118**, e2102147118 (2021).
10
K. L. McLoughlin et al., Misinformation exploits outrage to spread online. _Science_**386**, 991–996 (2024).
11
W. J. Brady, J. C. Jackson, B. Lindström, M. J. Crockett, Algorithm-mediated social learning in online social networks. _Trends Cogn. Sci._**27**, 947–960 (2023).
12
G. J. Leonardelli, C. L. Pickett, M. B. Brewer, “Chapter 2—Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations” in _Advances in Experimental Social Psychology_, M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, Eds. (Academic Press, 2010), pp. 63–113.
13
R. Imhoff, H.-P. Erb, What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. _Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull._**35**, 309–320 (2009).
14
J. Berger, K. L. Milkman, What makes online content viral? _J. Mark. Res._**49**, 192–205 (2012).
15
H. S. Kim, Attracting views and going viral: How message features and news-sharing channels affect health news diffusion. _J. Commun._**65**, 512–534 (2015).
16
D. Drążkowski, S. Pietrzak, L. Mądry, Temporary change in personality states among social media users: Effects of Instagram use on Big Five personality states and consumers’ need for uniqueness. _Curr. Issues Personal. Psychol._**10**, 32–38 (2022).
17
X. Zeng, L. Wei, Social ties and user content generation: Evidence from Flickr. _Inf. Syst. Res._**24**, 71–87 (2013).
18
C. Puryear et al., Rising Moralization in Social Media Discourse‘, PsyArXiv [Preprint] (2026). osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/z7p3u_v2.
19
H. Alves, A. Koch, C. Unkelbach, Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications. _Trends. Cogn. Sci._**21**, 69–79 (2017).
20
A. Koch, H. Alves, T. Krüger, C. Unkelbach, A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad. _J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn._**42**, 1171 (2016).
21
J. R. Averill, “On the paucity of positive emotions” in _Assessment and Modification of Emotional Behavior_, K. R. Blankstein, P. Pliner, J. Polivy, Eds. (Springer, US, 1980), pp. 7–45.
22
J. C. Jackson, K. Lindquist, R. Drabble, Q. Atkinson, J. Watts, Valence-dependent mutation in lexical evolution. _Nat. Hum. Behav._**7**, 190–199 (2023).
23
H. Alves, A. Koch, C. Unkelbach, My friends are all alike—the relation between liking and perceived similarity in person perception. _J. Exp. Soc. Psychol._**62**, 103–117 (2016).
24
R. Iliev, W. M. Bennis, The convergence of positivity: Are happy people all alike?. _J. Happiness Stud._**24**, 1643–1662 (2023).
25
J. Denrell, Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. _Psychol. Rev._**112**, 951 (2005).
26
R. F. Baumeister, E. Bratslavsky, C. Finkenauer, K. D. Vohs, Bad is stronger than good. _Rev. Gen. Psychol._**5**, 323–370 (2001).
27
H. Mao, J. C. Jackson, Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/68wvm. Accessed 9 June 2026.
- [a [...] Analysis scripts and data are available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r27-1)
- [b [...] Analysis scripts and data are available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r27-2)
28
O. Sobchuk, B. Beheim, Does literature evolve one funeral at a time? _Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci._**292**, 20242033 (2025).
29
N. Reimers, I. Gurevych, Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks. arXiv [Preprint] (2019), http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084 [Accessed 8 September 2025].
30
S. Rathje et al., GPT is an effective tool for multilingual psychological text analysis. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._**121**, e2308950121 (2024).
31
Y. R. Tausczik, J. W. Pennebaker, The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. _J. Lang. Soc. Psychol._**29**, 24–54 (2010).
32
J. Wilkerson, A. Casas, Large-scale computerized text analysis in political science: Opportunities and challenges. _Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci._**20**, 529–544 (2017).
33
J. M. Gottman, R. W. Levenson, The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. _J. Marriage Fam._**62**, 737–745 (2000).
34
R. Levy, Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. _Am. Econ. Rev._**111**, 831–870 (2021).
35
P. Törnberg, D. Valeeva, J. Uitermark, C. Bail, Simulating social media using large language models to evaluate alternative news feed algorithms. arXiv [Preprint] (2023), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.05984.
36
W. J. Brady et al., Redesigning algorithms to intervene on social norm misperceptions during a national election. _Nature_, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10536-1 (2026).
37
Y. Zhao et al., Attention on social media depends more on how you express yourself than on who you are. _Nat. Hum. Behav._**10**, 288–302 (2025).
38
G. H. Bower, “Adaptation-level coding of stimuli and serial position effects” in _Adapt.-Level Theory_ (1971), pp. 175–201.
39
stuck_in_the_matrix, W. R. Reddit comments/submissions 2005-06 to 2024-12 (Data set). Academic Torrents. https://academictorrents.com/details/ba051999301b109eab37d16f027b3f49ade2de13.
40
F. Shi, M. Teplitskiy, E. Duede, J. A. Evans, The wisdom of polarized crowds. _Nat. Hum. Behav._**3**, 329–336 (2019).
41
C. Hutto, E. Gilbert, “Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text” in _Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media_ (2014), pp. 216–225.
42
L. Hanu, Unitary team, Detoxify. GitHub. https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify. Accessed 24 January 2026.
- [a [...] purposes. The detoxify classifier is available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r42-1)
- [b [...] purposes. The detoxify classifier is available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r42-2)
43
N. Reimers, I. Gurevych, Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks. arXiv [Preprint] (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084 (Accessed 8 September 2025).
- [a [...] used to generate embeddings is available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r43-1)
- [b [...] used to generate embeddings is available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r43-2)
Show all references
Information & Authors
Information Authors
Information
#### Published in

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 123 | No. 26
June 30, 2026
PubMed: [42330286](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42330286/ "Link to PubMed")
#### Classifications
1. Social Science 2. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
#### Copyright
Copyright © 2026 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).
#### Data, Materials, and Software Availability
Analysis scripts and data are available at https://osf.io/68wvm/ (27). Data and code may not be used for commercial purposes. The detoxify classifier is available at https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify (42), and the sentence transformer used to generate embeddings is available at https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (43).
#### Submission history
**Received**: October 6, 2025
**Accepted**: May 7, 2026
**Published online**: June 22, 2026
**Published in issue**: June 30, 2026
#### Keywords
1. social media 2. computational social science 3. social psychology 4. information ecologies 5. cultural evolution
#### Acknowledgments
##### Author contributions
H.M., Y.C.L., A.K., and J.C.J. designed research; H.M., Y.J., and J.C.J. performed research; H.M., Y.J., and J.C.J. analyzed data; and H.M., Y.C.L., A.K., W.J.B., and J.C.J. wrote the paper.
##### Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
#### Notes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
*
https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify.
†
The source, “NPR reports,” was changed to “according to news reports” when displaying the news headline to participants.
‡
Users who submitted the form to request for their accounts being removed from the PushShift API were not included in the dump and thereby not in our study.
§
https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2.
Authors
#### Affiliations Expand All
##### Hongkai Mao1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2873-4076hm404@stanford.edu
Behavioral Science Department, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60640
Organizational Behavior Department, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
View all articles by this author
##### Yuan Chang Leonghttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2499-2393
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
Data Science Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60615
View all articles by this author
##### Yutong Jiang
Behavioral Science Department, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60640
View all articles by this author
##### Alex Koch
Behavioral Science Department, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60640
View all articles by this author
##### William J.Bradyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-5446
Department of Management and Organizations, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
View all articles by this author
##### Joshua Conrad Jackson1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-9815jcjackson@fas.harvard.edu
Behavioral Science Department, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60640
Data Science Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60615
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
View all articles by this author
#### Notes
1
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: hm404@stanford.edu or jcjackson@fas.harvard.edu.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics Citations
Metrics
Article usage
- [Views](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123# "Views")
- Citations
No data available.
222
0
- Total
Total number of views
Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.
#### Altmetrics
 See more details
Referenced by **4** Bluesky users
Citations
#### Cite this article
- H. Mao,
- Y.C. Leong,
- Y. Jiang,
- A. Koch,
- W.J. Brady,
- [[...]](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123# "Expand author list")
- &J.C. Jackson,
- +0 authors
Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media, _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._ 123 (26) e2527316123,https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2527316123(2026).
Copy
Copied!
Copying failed.
Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.
Format
- [x] Direct import
Figures
Tables
Media
Share
Share
#### Share article link
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123
COPY LINK
Copied!
Copying failed.
#### Share on social media
[Facebook](https://www.pnas.org/#facebook "Share on Facebook")[X (formerly Twitter)](https://www.pnas.org/#twitter "Share on X (formerly Twitter)")[LinkedIn](https://www.pnas.org/#linkedin "Share on LinkedIn")[Gmail](https://www.pnas.org/#google_gmail "Share on Gmail")[email](https://www.pnas.org/#email "Share on email")
Get Access
Get Access
#### Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal loginInstitutional Login
#### Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
Join the global community of subscribers to PNAS, the flagship journal of the US National Academy of Sciences, a mission-driven nonprofit society. PNAS is one of the world's most-cited scientific journals. Get full access to our research, archives, and author benefits. Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian.
Save for laterItem saved, go to cart
#### Purchase options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
Single Article Purchase
**Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media**
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 123
- No. 26
$20.00
Add to Cart
#### Restore content access
Restore content access for purchases made as a guest
References
References
#### References
1
G. Fariello, D. Jemielniak, A. Sulkowski, Does Godwin’s law (rule of Nazi analogies) apply in observable reality? An empirical study of selected words in 199 million Reddit posts _New Media Soc._**26**, 389–404 (2024).
2
J. J. Van Bavel, C. E. Robertson, K. del Rosario, J. Rasmussen, S. Rathje, Social media and morality. _Annu. Rev. Psychol._**75**, 311–340 (2024).
3
W. J. Brady, J. A. Wills, J. T. Jost, J. A. Tucker, J. J. Van Bavel, Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._**114**, 7313–7318 (2017).
[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Emotion+shapes+the+diffusion+of+mora