p.enthalabs

Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media

![Image 1: PNAS](https://www.pnas.org/)![Image 2: PNAS Logo](https://www.pnas.org/)

[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#)

- ARTICLESCurrent IssueLatest ArticlesSpecial FeaturesList of Issues_PNAS Nexus_

- Front Matter

- AUTHORSInformation for AuthorsEditorial and Journal PoliciesSubmission ProceduresPublication Charges

* Topics

- Physical Sciences

- Social Sciences

- Biological Sciences

#### Featured Topics

- Physics

- Chemistry

- Sustainability Science

- Sustainable Development Goals

#### Articles By Topic

- Applied Mathematics

- Applied Physical Sciences

- Astronomy

- Biophysics and Computational Biology

- Computer Sciences

- Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences

- Engineering

- Environmental Sciences

- Mathematics

- Statistics

#### Featured Topics

- Anthropology

- Sustainability Science

- Sustainable Development Goals

#### Articles By Topic

- Demography

- Economic Sciences

- Environmental Sciences

- Political Sciences

- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

- Social Sciences

#### Featured Topic

- Anthropology

- Sustainability Science

- Sustainable Development Goals

#### Articles By Topic

- Agricultural Sciences

- Applied Biological Sciences

- Biochemistry

- Biophysics and Computational Biology

- Cell Biology

- Developmental Biology

- Ecology

- Environmental Sciences

- Evolution

- Genetics

- Immunology and Inflammation

- Medical Sciences

- Microbiology

- Neuroscience

- Pharmacology

- Physiology

- Plant Biology

- Population Biology

- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

- Systems Biology

*

[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123# "Search")

[Shopping cart with 0 item Cart](https://www.pnas.org/action/showCart?FlowID=1 "Cart")

Sign inRegister

Individual LoginInstitutional Login

Submit

Quick Search anywhere

Enter journal, DOI, article type, keywords, authors, etc.

Quick search in Citations

Journal*

Year Volume* Issue* Page/eLocation ID*

*Required field

Quick Search in Journals

Enter journal, DOI, article type, keywords, authors, etc.

Quick Search in Journals

Enter journal, DOI, article type, keywords, authors, etc.

Searching:

Anywhere

AnywhereCitationPNAS NexusProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Advanced SearchSearch

SUGGESTED SEARCHES:

Covid-19Artificial IntelligenceMpoxClimate ChangeGun Violence

Sign inRegister

Individual LoginInstitutional Login

Quick Search anywhere

Enter journal, DOI, article type, keywords, authors, etc.

- ###### ARTICLES

- Current Issue

- Latest Articles

- Special Features

- List of Issues

- _PNAS Nexus_

- Front Matter

- ###### AUTHORS

- Information for Authors

- Editorial and Journal Policies

- Submission Procedures

- Publication Charges

- Topics

![Image 3: PNAS](https://www.pnas.org/)

- [](https://www.facebook.com/pages/PNAS/18262365099 "Facebook")

- _![Image 4_](https://twitter.com/PNASNews "Twitter")

- _![Image 5_](https://bsky.app/profile/pnas.org "Bluesky")

- [](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYjvFEQMgH6ou8fSYfiOKCw "Youtube")

- [](https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/pnas-news/ "LinkedIn")

- [](https://www.pnas.org/action/showPreferences?menuTab=Alerts "Mail")

- [](https://www.pnas.org/about/rss "RSS feeds")

ContactSite MapTerms & Privacy PolicyAccessibility

backPhysical Sciences

#### Featured Topics

- Physics

- Chemistry

- Sustainability Science

- Sustainable Development Goals

#### Articles By Topic

- Applied Mathematics

- Applied Physical Sciences

- Astronomy

- Biophysics and Computational Biology

- Computer Sciences

- Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences

- Engineering

- Environmental Sciences

- Mathematics

- Statistics

backSocial Sciences

#### Featured Topics

- Anthropology

- Sustainability Science

- Sustainable Development Goals

#### Articles By Topic

- Demography

- Economic Sciences

- Environmental Sciences

- Political Sciences

- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

- Social Sciences

backBiological Sciences

#### Featured Topic

- Anthropology

- Sustainability Science

- Sustainable Development Goals

#### Articles By Topic

- Agricultural Sciences

- Applied Biological Sciences

- Biochemistry

- Biophysics and Computational Biology

- Cell Biology

- Developmental Biology

- Ecology

- Environmental Sciences

- Evolution

- Genetics

- Immunology and Inflammation

- Medical Sciences

- Microbiology

- Neuroscience

- Pharmacology

- Physiology

- Plant Biology

- Population Biology

- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

- Systems Biology

backTopics

- Physical Sciences

- Social Sciences

- Biological Sciences

Reference #1

[Research Article](https://www.pnas.org/topic/type/research-article "Research Article landing page")

[Psychological and Cognitive Sciences](https://www.pnas.org/topic/psych-soc "Psychological and Cognitive Sciences landing page")

Share on

- [](https://www.pnas.org/#facebook "Facebook")

- [](https://www.pnas.org/#x "X")

- [](https://www.pnas.org/#bluesky "Bluesky")

- [](https://www.pnas.org/#linkedin "LinkedIn")

- [](https://www.pnas.org/#email "Email")

[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123# "Check for updates on crossmark")

Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media

Hongkai Maohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2873-4076hm404@stanford.edu, Yuan Chang Leonghttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2499-2393, Yutong Jiang, +2, Alex Koch, William J.Bradyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-5446, and Joshua Conrad Jacksonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-9815jcjackson@fas.harvard.edu-2Authors Info & Affiliations

Edited by Mark Granovetter, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; received October 6, 2025; accepted May 7, 2026

June 22, 2026

123 (26) e2527316123

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2527316123

222

Metrics

#### Total Views 222

- Last 12 Months 222

[View all metrics](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123?doi=10.1073/pnas.2527316123#tab-metrics-inner "Go to metrics page")

Track CitationsAdd to Reading List

[](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#tab-citations)

Get Access

Contents

[Vol. 123 | No. 26](https://www.pnas.org/toc/pnas/123/26 "View Table of Contents")

- Significance

- Abstract

- Data, Materials, and Software Availability

- Acknowledgments

- Supporting Information

- References

- Information & Authors

- Metrics & Citations

- Get Access

- References

- Figures

- Tables

- Media

- Share

Significance

We live in a digital age, where billions of people engage in dialogue within topic-bound communities and threads. In an archival analysis of over 2 billion Reddit comments and an experiment, we show that this dialogue becomes more negative over time. Further analyses suggest that negativity rises over time because social media users seek to make unique comments on the same topic, and it is easier to differentiate oneself through negative comments than through positive comments. As threads and communities evolve, and it becomes more difficult to make unique observations, users turn to negativity. Our studies show how basic human motives interact with the structure of social media platforms, posing an acute challenge for sustaining healthy online dialogue.

Abstract

Most people believe that social media discourse is negative and divisive. Here we show how this negativity can evolve even when users are not motivated to be negative. We propose that social media users seek to differentiate themselves from other users, and it is easier to differentiate oneself through negativity than positivity because negative information is more heterogeneous and counternormative than positive information. This makes users increasingly likely to post negative comments as a conversation unfolds and it becomes more challenging to make unique contributions. Analyzing 2.05 billion comments from 2,150 Reddit communities shows that comments become more negative over time, both within threads and community histories. This trend toward negativity is mediated by the semantic uniqueness of comments, suggesting that it arises from users differentiating themselves. This trend is strongest when initial dialogue is positive, making negative comments highly counternormative. We replicate these patterns in an experiment simulating social media dialogue (_n_ = 3,685). Participants become more negative over time, but only when incentivized to be unique, and especially when dialogue begins positively. These findings suggest that the structure of social media platforms interacts with human motivation to foster a drift toward negativity over time in online discourse.

Get full access to this article

Purchase, subscribe, or recommend this article to your librarian.

GET ACCESS

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

Analysis scripts and data are available at https://osf.io/68wvm/ (27). Data and code may not be used for commercial purposes. The detoxify classifier is available at https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify (42), and the sentence transformer used to generate embeddings is available at https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (43).

Acknowledgments

Author contributions

H.M., Y.C.L., A.K., and J.C.J. designed research; H.M., Y.J., and J.C.J. performed research; H.M., Y.J., and J.C.J. analyzed data; and H.M., Y.C.L., A.K., W.J.B., and J.C.J. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Supporting Information

Appendix 01 (PDF)

- Download

- 3.41 MB

References

1

G. Fariello, D. Jemielniak, A. Sulkowski, Does Godwin’s law (rule of Nazi analogies) apply in observable reality? An empirical study of selected words in 199 million Reddit posts _New Media Soc._**26**, 389–404 (2024).

View

Google Scholar

2

J. J. Van Bavel, C. E. Robertson, K. del Rosario, J. Rasmussen, S. Rathje, Social media and morality. _Annu. Rev. Psychol._**75**, 311–340 (2024).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

3

W. J. Brady, J. A. Wills, J. T. Jost, J. A. Tucker, J. J. Van Bavel, Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._**114**, 7313–7318 (2017).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

4

I. Waller, A. Anderson, Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. _Nature_**600**, 264–268 (2021).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

5

W. J. Brady, M. J. Crockett, J. J. Van Bavel, The MAD model of moral contagion: The role of motivation, attention, and design in the spread of moralized content online. _Perspect. Psychol. Sci._**15**, 978–1010 (2020).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

6

M. Avalle et al., Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time. _Nature_**628**, 582–589 (2024).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

7

S. Rathje, C. Robertson, W. J. Brady, J. J. Van Bavel, People think that social media platforms do (but should not) amplify divisive content. _Perspect. Psychol. Sci._**19**, 781–795 (2024).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

8

B. Auxier, 64% of Americans say social media have a mostly negative effect on the way things are going in the U.S. today. _Pew Res. Cent._ (2020), [https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/10/15/64-of-americans-say-social-media-have-a-mostly-negative-effect-on-the-way-things-are-going-in-the-u-s-today/](https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/10/15/64-of-americans-say-social-media-have-a-mostly-negative-effect-on-the-way-things-are-going-in-the-u-s-today/) [Accessed 19 April 2025].

Google Scholar

9

C. K. Tokita, A. M. Guess, C. E. Tarnita, Polarized information ecosystems can reorganize social networks via information cascades. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._**118**, e2102147118 (2021).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

10

K. L. McLoughlin et al., Misinformation exploits outrage to spread online. _Science_**386**, 991–996 (2024).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

11

W. J. Brady, J. C. Jackson, B. Lindström, M. J. Crockett, Algorithm-mediated social learning in online social networks. _Trends Cogn. Sci._**27**, 947–960 (2023).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

12

G. J. Leonardelli, C. L. Pickett, M. B. Brewer, “Chapter 2—Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations” in _Advances in Experimental Social Psychology_, M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, Eds. (Academic Press, 2010), pp. 63–113.

Google Scholar

13

R. Imhoff, H.-P. Erb, What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. _Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull._**35**, 309–320 (2009).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

14

J. Berger, K. L. Milkman, What makes online content viral? _J. Mark. Res._**49**, 192–205 (2012).

View

Google Scholar

15

H. S. Kim, Attracting views and going viral: How message features and news-sharing channels affect health news diffusion. _J. Commun._**65**, 512–534 (2015).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

16

D. Drążkowski, S. Pietrzak, L. Mądry, Temporary change in personality states among social media users: Effects of Instagram use on Big Five personality states and consumers’ need for uniqueness. _Curr. Issues Personal. Psychol._**10**, 32–38 (2022).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

17

X. Zeng, L. Wei, Social ties and user content generation: Evidence from Flickr. _Inf. Syst. Res._**24**, 71–87 (2013).

View

Google Scholar

18

C. Puryear et al., Rising Moralization in Social Media Discourse‘, PsyArXiv [Preprint] (2026). osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/z7p3u_v2.

Google Scholar

19

H. Alves, A. Koch, C. Unkelbach, Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications. _Trends. Cogn. Sci._**21**, 69–79 (2017).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

20

A. Koch, H. Alves, T. Krüger, C. Unkelbach, A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad. _J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn._**42**, 1171 (2016).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

21

J. R. Averill, “On the paucity of positive emotions” in _Assessment and Modification of Emotional Behavior_, K. R. Blankstein, P. Pliner, J. Polivy, Eds. (Springer, US, 1980), pp. 7–45.

View

Google Scholar

22

J. C. Jackson, K. Lindquist, R. Drabble, Q. Atkinson, J. Watts, Valence-dependent mutation in lexical evolution. _Nat. Hum. Behav._**7**, 190–199 (2023).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

23

H. Alves, A. Koch, C. Unkelbach, My friends are all alike—the relation between liking and perceived similarity in person perception. _J. Exp. Soc. Psychol._**62**, 103–117 (2016).

View

Google Scholar

24

R. Iliev, W. M. Bennis, The convergence of positivity: Are happy people all alike?. _J. Happiness Stud._**24**, 1643–1662 (2023).

View

Google Scholar

25

J. Denrell, Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. _Psychol. Rev._**112**, 951 (2005).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

26

R. F. Baumeister, E. Bratslavsky, C. Finkenauer, K. D. Vohs, Bad is stronger than good. _Rev. Gen. Psychol._**5**, 323–370 (2001).

View

Google Scholar

27

H. Mao, J. C. Jackson, Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/68wvm. Accessed 9 June 2026.

Google Scholar

- [a [...] Analysis scripts and data are available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r27-1)

- [b [...] Analysis scripts and data are available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r27-2)

28

O. Sobchuk, B. Beheim, Does literature evolve one funeral at a time? _Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci._**292**, 20242033 (2025).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

29

N. Reimers, I. Gurevych, Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks. arXiv [Preprint] (2019), http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084 [Accessed 8 September 2025].

Google Scholar

30

S. Rathje et al., GPT is an effective tool for multilingual psychological text analysis. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._**121**, e2308950121 (2024).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

31

Y. R. Tausczik, J. W. Pennebaker, The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. _J. Lang. Soc. Psychol._**29**, 24–54 (2010).

View

Google Scholar

32

J. Wilkerson, A. Casas, Large-scale computerized text analysis in political science: Opportunities and challenges. _Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci._**20**, 529–544 (2017).

View

Google Scholar

33

J. M. Gottman, R. W. Levenson, The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. _J. Marriage Fam._**62**, 737–745 (2000).

View

Google Scholar

34

R. Levy, Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. _Am. Econ. Rev._**111**, 831–870 (2021).

View

Google Scholar

35

P. Törnberg, D. Valeeva, J. Uitermark, C. Bail, Simulating social media using large language models to evaluate alternative news feed algorithms. arXiv [Preprint] (2023), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.05984.

Google Scholar

36

W. J. Brady et al., Redesigning algorithms to intervene on social norm misperceptions during a national election. _Nature_, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10536-1 (2026).

Google Scholar

37

Y. Zhao et al., Attention on social media depends more on how you express yourself than on who you are. _Nat. Hum. Behav._**10**, 288–302 (2025).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

38

G. H. Bower, “Adaptation-level coding of stimuli and serial position effects” in _Adapt.-Level Theory_ (1971), pp. 175–201.

Google Scholar

39

stuck_in_the_matrix, W. R. Reddit comments/submissions 2005-06 to 2024-12 (Data set). Academic Torrents. https://academictorrents.com/details/ba051999301b109eab37d16f027b3f49ade2de13.

Google Scholar

40

F. Shi, M. Teplitskiy, E. Duede, J. A. Evans, The wisdom of polarized crowds. _Nat. Hum. Behav._**3**, 329–336 (2019).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

41

C. Hutto, E. Gilbert, “Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text” in _Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media_ (2014), pp. 216–225.

Google Scholar

42

L. Hanu, Unitary team, Detoxify. GitHub. https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify. Accessed 24 January 2026.

Google Scholar

- [a [...] purposes. The detoxify classifier is available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r42-1)

- [b [...] purposes. The detoxify classifier is available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r42-2)

43

N. Reimers, I. Gurevych, Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks. arXiv [Preprint] (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084 (Accessed 8 September 2025).

Google Scholar

- [a [...] used to generate embeddings is available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r43-1)

- [b [...] used to generate embeddings is available at](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123#core-r43-2)

Show all references

Information & Authors

Information Authors

Information

#### Published in

![Image 6: The cover image for PNAS Vol.123; No.26](https://www.pnas.org/toc/pnas/123/26 "View the PNAS Table of Contents Vol.123; No.26")

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Vol. 123 | No. 26

June 30, 2026

PubMed: [42330286](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42330286/ "Link to PubMed")

#### Classifications

1. Social Science 2. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

#### Copyright

Copyright © 2026 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

#### Data, Materials, and Software Availability

Analysis scripts and data are available at https://osf.io/68wvm/ (27). Data and code may not be used for commercial purposes. The detoxify classifier is available at https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify (42), and the sentence transformer used to generate embeddings is available at https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (43).

#### Submission history

**Received**: October 6, 2025

**Accepted**: May 7, 2026

**Published online**: June 22, 2026

**Published in issue**: June 30, 2026

#### Keywords

1. social media 2. computational social science 3. social psychology 4. information ecologies 5. cultural evolution

#### Acknowledgments

##### Author contributions

H.M., Y.C.L., A.K., and J.C.J. designed research; H.M., Y.J., and J.C.J. performed research; H.M., Y.J., and J.C.J. analyzed data; and H.M., Y.C.L., A.K., W.J.B., and J.C.J. wrote the paper.

##### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

#### Notes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

*

https://github.com/unitaryai/detoxify.

The source, “NPR reports,” was changed to “according to news reports” when displaying the news headline to participants.

Users who submitted the form to request for their accounts being removed from the PushShift API were not included in the dump and thereby not in our study.

§

https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2.

Authors

#### Affiliations Expand All

##### Hongkai Mao1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2873-4076hm404@stanford.edu

Behavioral Science Department, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60640

Organizational Behavior Department, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

View all articles by this author

##### Yuan Chang Leonghttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2499-2393

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637

Data Science Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60615

View all articles by this author

##### Yutong Jiang

Behavioral Science Department, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60640

View all articles by this author

##### Alex Koch

Behavioral Science Department, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60640

View all articles by this author

##### William J.Bradyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-5446

Department of Management and Organizations, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208

View all articles by this author

##### Joshua Conrad Jackson1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-9815jcjackson@fas.harvard.edu

Behavioral Science Department, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60640

Data Science Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60615

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138

View all articles by this author

#### Notes

1

To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: hm404@stanford.edu or jcjackson@fas.harvard.edu.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics Citations

Metrics

Article usage

- [Views](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123# "Views")

- Citations

No data available.

222

0

- Total

- First 90 Days

Total number of views

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.

#### Altmetrics

![Image 7: Article has an altmetric score of 12](https://www.altmetric.com/details.php?domain=www.pnas.org&citation_id=198567526) See more details

Blogged by **1**

Posted by **3** X users

Referenced by **4** Bluesky users

Citations

#### Cite this article

- H. Mao,

- Y.C. Leong,

- Y. Jiang,

- A. Koch,

- W.J. Brady,

- [[...]](https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123# "Expand author list")

- &J.C. Jackson,

- +0 authors

Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media, _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._ 123 (26) e2527316123,https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2527316123(2026).

Copy

Copied!

Copying failed.

Export the article citation data by selecting a format from the list below and clicking Export.

Format

- [x] Direct import

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

#### Share article link

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2527316123

COPY LINK

Copied!

Copying failed.

#### Share on social media

[Facebook](https://www.pnas.org/#facebook "Share on Facebook")[X (formerly Twitter)](https://www.pnas.org/#twitter "Share on X (formerly Twitter)")[LinkedIn](https://www.pnas.org/#linkedin "Share on LinkedIn")[Gmail](https://www.pnas.org/#google_gmail "Share on Gmail")[email](https://www.pnas.org/#email "Share on email")

Get Access

Get Access

#### Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal loginInstitutional Login

#### Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

Join the global community of subscribers to PNAS, the flagship journal of the US National Academy of Sciences, a mission-driven nonprofit society. PNAS is one of the world's most-cited scientific journals. Get full access to our research, archives, and author benefits. Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian.

Save for laterItem saved, go to cart

#### Purchase options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Single Article Purchase

**Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media**

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

- Vol. 123

- No. 26

$20.00

Add to Cart

Checkout

#### Restore content access

Restore content access for purchases made as a guest

References

References

#### References

1

G. Fariello, D. Jemielniak, A. Sulkowski, Does Godwin’s law (rule of Nazi analogies) apply in observable reality? An empirical study of selected words in 199 million Reddit posts _New Media Soc._**26**, 389–404 (2024).

View

Google Scholar

2

J. J. Van Bavel, C. E. Robertson, K. del Rosario, J. Rasmussen, S. Rathje, Social media and morality. _Annu. Rev. Psychol._**75**, 311–340 (2024).

View

PubMed

Google Scholar

3

W. J. Brady, J. A. Wills, J. T. Jost, J. A. Tucker, J. J. Van Bavel, Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A._**114**, 7313–7318 (2017).

View

PubMed

[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Emotion+shapes+the+diffusion+of+mora